👉Our AI agents platform is now PCI DSS L1 certified!

sei
All Posts
Ramkumar Venkataraman

Ramkumar Venkataraman

CTO & Co-Founder

53 articles

Compliance

Regulation Z 1026.36 Loan Originator Compensation and Where AI Vendor Pricing Sits: The Terms-Based Comp Prohibition, the Person-Definition Question, and How the Vendor Contract Has to Read

The Loan Originator Compensation rule at Reg Z 1026.36 prohibits paying an individual loan originator based on the terms of the loan, and it defines 'loan originator' broadly enough to swallow the AI vendor conversation. The person-definition analysis, the compensation-attribution question that a per-loan vendor fee raises, and the contract structure that keeps the AI vendor's economics outside the LO Comp perimeter.

Jul 10, 202612 min read
Read more
Servicing

HELOC Draw-to-Repayment Reset Servicing With AI Agents: Reg Z 1026.40, the Interest-Only-to-Amortizing Shock, and the Conversation the Bank Postpones Until It Cannot

Home equity lines of credit have the least-understood transition in consumer lending: the end of the interest-only draw period and the start of the fully amortizing repayment period, which for a borrower on a 20-year post-draw schedule commonly doubles the monthly payment. Reg Z 1026.40 disclosures and 1026.9(c)(1) change-in-terms rules run alongside servicing operations that have to explain the reset to a borrower who did not read the original disclosure. The playbook we run so the reset conversation lands well and the servicer's file survives review.

Jul 10, 202612 min read
Read more
Compliance

Reg X §§1024.35 and 1024.36 on the AI Servicing Desk: The Five-Day Ack, the Thirty-Day Substantive Response, and the Categorization Problem That Decides Everything

The mortgage servicer's Notice of Error and Request for Information rules under Regulation X 1024.35 and 1024.36 are the two response clocks that produce more CFPB findings than any other servicing provision. The categorization of a borrower's letter or call is the decision that sets the clock, and the AI agent that gets the categorization wrong hands the servicer a violation the servicer will not know about until the exam. The architecture we run to keep the clock, the categorization, and the response record aligned.

Jul 3, 202615 min read
Read more
Compliance

The Beneficial Ownership Intake the Commercial Bank Still Has to Run: CDD Rule 1010.230, CTA/BOI After the March 2025 Interim Rule, and Where the AI Agent Sits

The Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership filing regime has been through two injunctions, a Supreme Court stay, and a March 2025 FinCEN interim final rule that exempted domestic reporting companies. What has not changed is the bank's independent Customer Due Diligence rule at 31 CFR 1010.230, which requires beneficial-ownership collection at legal-entity account opening under the same 25 percent and substantial-control tests. The intake architecture we run on the commercial-banking desk while the two regimes remain unaligned.

Jul 3, 202613 min read
Read more
Compliance

Ability-to-Repay Under Reg Z 1026.43 in AI-Assisted Underwriting: The Eight Factors, the Revised General QM Price Test, and the Documentation Boundary the Agent Cannot Cross Alone

The ATR/QM rule at Reg Z 1026.43 has been through three rounds of major revision since 2013, and the current General QM definition anchors on an APR-to-APOR price threshold rather than the old 43-percent DTI cap. AI underwriting participates in ATR analysis by producing the eight-factor computation, but the documentation of the third-party verification the rule requires and the qualification decision the rule allocates to the creditor are places the agent's autonomy stops. Where AI actually sits in the ATR workflow and what the audit file has to contain.

Jul 3, 202614 min read
Read more
Compliance

HMDA Data Integrity for AI-Driven Loan Origination: The Reg C LAR Fields, the Resubmission Threshold, and the Audit File That Survives

AI agents on the mortgage intake desk now populate a meaningful share of the 110 HMDA LAR fields before a human ever looks at the file. The Reg C accuracy rules and the CFPB resubmission threshold catch the gaps before fair-lending analysis ever runs, and the architecture has to make field provenance and correction provable per loan.

Jun 26, 202615 min read
Read more
AI Agents

UCC Article 4A and the AI Wire-Verification Architecture: Commercially Reasonable Security Procedures When the Caller Is Verified But the Instruction Is Not

Wire fraud losses are running at multi-billion-dollar annual totals and the legal allocation of those losses runs through UCC Article 4A's commercially-reasonable-security-procedure standard. AI voice authentication of the caller does not, by itself, satisfy the security procedure for a payment instruction. The architecture we run so the bank's Article 4A position holds in court when the instruction was the fraud.

Jun 26, 202614 min read
Read more
Compliance

The Interagency 36-Hour Computer-Security Incident Notification Rule Applied to Bank AI Systems

The OCC's Part 53, the FDIC's Part 304 Subpart C, and the Federal Reserve's Part 225 Subpart N gave banks a 36-hour clock on notification incidents. The architecture we run so an AI agent failure, a model-vendor outage, or a prompt-injection-driven exfiltration is detected, classified, and reported inside the window.

Jun 12, 202612 min read
Read more
Comparisons

Sei AI vs Gateless: Mortgage Underwriting Automation, End to End

A detailed comparison of Sei AI and Gateless for mortgage underwriting — income calculation with Fannie Mae Income Calculator rep-and-warrant relief, condition clearing against agency guidelines and overlays, plus pre-close and post-close QC.

Jun 12, 20262 min read
Read more
Comparisons

Sei AI vs Prudent AI: Income Calculation and the Full Mortgage Workflow

A detailed comparison of Sei AI and Prudent AI for mortgage income calculation — bank-statement and self-employed income, Fannie Mae Income Calculator rep-and-warrant relief, and the underwriting, closing, and QC that follow.

Jun 11, 20262 min read
Read more
Comparisons

Sei AI vs Candor: Autonomous Mortgage Underwriting in Context

A detailed comparison of Sei AI and Candor for autonomous mortgage underwriting — condition clearing, income calculation with Fannie Mae Income Calculator rep-and-warrant relief, and the pre-underwriting, closing, and QC around it.

Jun 10, 20262 min read
Read more
Comparisons

Sei AI vs Ocrolus: From Document Data to Funded Mortgages

A detailed comparison of Sei AI and Ocrolus for mortgage document intelligence — classification and extraction, income calculation with Fannie Mae Income Calculator rep-and-warrant relief, condition clearing, and end-to-end QC.

Jun 9, 20262 min read
Read more

BOOK A DEMO

Embed Sei AI in your workflows
Tell us about your operations. We'll show you how Sei handles borrower calls, processes loan documents, and monitors compliance for mortgage lenders and banks.
  • Deploy in weeks, not months
  • Trained on FDCPA, TCPA, TILA, UDAAP, and RESPA
  • SOC 2 Type II and PCI DSS L1 certified
  • Integrates with your LOS, CRM, and telephony

Please provide your full name so we know how to address you.

Tell us which company you represent so we can personalise our response.

Use your work email so we can connect you with the right specialist.

Choose the topics you’d like us to cover during the demo.

Complete the verification to submit the form.

sei

AI operations platform for mortgage lenders, servicers, and banks. Handle borrower calls, process loan documents, and monitor compliance.

Partners

Speechmatics

© 2026 Sei Software Technologies Inc. All rights reserved.